The Governance Layer for AI Agents

Govern AI agents at scale.
Audit-ready decisions.
Visible dissent.

Council of AI is the Governance Layer for AI Agents — a BFT council substrate where 5 LLMs vote on every response with disagreement visible and the whole exchange HMAC-signed for EU AI Act Article 12 audit evidence. BFT Council voting is our core technology feature, running 47 MIT-licensed compliance MCPs across 8 agent-interop protocols. Linux-Foundation-governed A2A spine; MIT licence on source.

47 MCPs in Anthropic Registry · 8 agent-interop protocols · 30+ regulatory frameworks · MIT source · HMAC-signed attestations · By MEOK AI Labs (CSOAI LTD · CH 16939677)

Why a council, not a single model

Every existing AI shell shows one answer from one model. Council of AI shows 5 LLMs voting per response, with the dissent visible. When 3 of 5 agree, you see that. When the vote splits 3-2, you see that. When the 2 disagree on Article 50 vs Article 73, you see that.

Why this matters: EU regulators are starting to enforce AI Act Article 14 (human oversight) and Article 12 (audit log keeping). DORA Article 17 wants incident reporting. "The LLM said so" is not a defensible audit trail. "The 5-LLM council voted 4-1 with the dissent recorded and HMAC-signed at verify.meok.ai" — that is.

5 specialty packs in the Council

Each pack is a substrate of MEOK MCPs you can buy alone, or bundle as the Universe (all 47 MCPs · 500K calls/month · £1,499/mo).

🤝
Pack 1 · 12 MCPs

A2A Substrate

£499/mo · PAYG £0.0002/call

Identity → trust → policy → firewall → rate-limit → handoff → audit → governance bridge. Multi-protocol bridges to MCP / A2A / IBM ACP / Stripe ACP / AP2 / x402.

See A2A Substrate →
🏛️
Pack 2 · 10 MCPs

Governance Substrate

£499/mo · ISO 42001/42005

EU AI Act + DORA + NIS2 + CRA + UK AI Bill + AI-BOM + bias + watermarking + DORA×NIS2 crosswalk + AI incident reporting. 5-clock incident chain.

See Governance Substrate →
🛡️
Pack 3 · 6 MCPs

Cybersec Substrate

£199/mo

SBOM CycloneDX + MITRE ATT&CK + MITRE ATLAS + CISA KEV + SLSA + Sigstore. EO 14028, NIS2 Article 21, EU CRA Annex I.

Buy Cybersec £199/mo →
🏦
Pack 4 · 5 tools

COBOL Substrate NEW

£999/mo · Pro · 220B-line market

Copybook Parser + CICS Bridge + JCL Scanner + COBOL-Coder-14B transpiler (73.95% compile success vs GPT-4o 41.8%) + governance crosswalk. Banks, insurance, government, defence.

See COBOL Substrate →
🏭
Pack 5 · 8 MCPs

Industry Substrate

£299/mo

MiCA + FSA Food Safety + MDR + FDA SaMD + COPPA/FERPA + Basel III + MiFID II + AML/KYC. Sector-specific compliance.

Browse industry MCPs →
Best value
🌌
All 5 packs · 47 MCPs

Council Universe

£1,499/mo · 500K calls

Every pack included. 99.9% SLA target. Unified api.meok.ai endpoint. Per-call PAYG above 500K. Dedicated support. For multi-substrate compliance teams.

Subscribe Universe →

3 Simple Tiers

TierPriceWhat's includedBuy
Free£0Self-host any of 47 MCPs via uvx — MITGitHub →
Pro£1,499/moAll 47 MCPs · 500K calls/month · BFT council · multi-protocolSubscribe →
Enterprise£4,990/moPro + on-prem deployment + dedicated CSM + reseller rightsContact →

FAQ

What is a BFT Council?

Byzantine Fault Tolerant council = 5 different LLMs vote on every response. Disagreements are surfaced to the user, not hidden behind a "confidence score". The whole exchange is HMAC-signed for EU AI Act Article 12 audit evidence.

How does this differ from meok.ai?

meok.ai is the parent brand + the catalogue of 47 MCPs. councilof.ai is the product domain for the Council substrate that runs them all behind a BFT layer. Same legal entity (CSOAI LTD), same MIT source, different audience.

What about the previous Council of AI storefront?

Council of AI launched in April 2026 as a compliance storefront. We've reframed it around BFT council voting after seeing demand for visible-disagreement evidence from EU regulated buyers. Existing customers' £29 / £79 / £499 subscriptions and signing keys are unchanged; the page just leads with the council positioning now.

Is this just an ensemble?

Technically yes. The unique bit is making the disagreement visible per response (not hidden behind a "confidence score"), HMAC-signing the whole council vote into the audit chain, and shipping it as a substrate that runs under any client (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, custom MCP/A2A agents).

Who's behind this?

Founder + sole engineer: Nicholas Templeman. Solo, building from Lincolnshire UK. CSOAI LTD, UK Companies House 16939677. 26 PyPI packages with 6,798 monthly installs, 91 commits to the public COBOL-bridge repo — all single-contributor verifiable on GitHub.